Journals
I think every teacher who has seen or read The Freedom Writers has wanted to use journals in a classroom as effectively as Mrs. Gruwell. I cannot say that my own foray into journal use in the classroom was nearly as enlightening, but I was very happy with how they worked with our course.
Writing courses in China are skill specific, with a heavy emphasis on using higher level vocabulary and certain key phrases. In the many tests they have to take throughout high school and college, they do better on these tests when they use (and often misuse) higher level vocabulary and stick to these prefabricated phrases. For instance, my students will often begin a paper (irregardless of the topic) with the these point-gatherers: "In our modern society" or "With our rapidly developing technology and economies." It could be an essay on the pros and cons of pets, and this would be how they begin their essay. They would also interject common phrases such as: "As we all know", "In a word...", "common phenomenon", and "...will make your life more colorful", to name a few examples.
A common phenomenon... |
When we ask our students to write, regardless of the format, they are more inclined to give us what they think we want to hear, which is something that is filled with these catch phrases and upper level vocabulary. The content, what they are actually saying, seems to take a back burner. I did not want the writing in our cross cultural reading class to be these canned, rehearsed essays; I wanted to see their reflections and thoughts on the readings and what we discussed in class. I wanted their honest opinions, thoughts, and connections. So I introduced the journal on our second day of class.
I explained that journals were informal, a space for your thoughts on what we read. I told them several times (life long habits are hard to break) that I did not care about grammar or spelling, only their thoughts. I told them that I would be collecting the journals and reading them, but their grades would be based only on participation. If they responded regularly and demonstrated that they had devoted time and attention to their entries, they would do fine. If they gave me a series of entries that were only a few sentences long, they would not do well.
Now, it turns out that they were not familiar with a free response kind of journaling. I kept getting entries about what they were feeling or about things not relating to our class or the readings. So I began to give them very broad questions or ideas to discuss in each entry. Some questions asked for them to think about the reading material, some asked them to relate the material to other texts, and some asked them to relate the material to their own lives. I would usually give them 2-3 topics that they could choose from to discuss in each of their entries. After giving them some direction in what to write about in each entry, the majority of the students began to give me insightful journal entries that discussed the characters and stories that we were reading.
They would write about how lovely the historic West Lake was on a sunny day, for example... |
I had 25 students in this class, so I could not realistically collect all of the journals each week. Additionally, I wanted to make sure students were keeping up faithfully with the journals, and not simply cramming in a bunch of entries before the due date. Because, when given the opportunity, myself included, who doesn't do that? I told them that I would be randomly collecting five journals each week. I would call out students names at the end of each class, and since they were graded on participation, they would lose credit if they had missing entries. This seemed to work, in that most of my students kept their journals up-to-date and brought them to class each week.
I did collect all of the journals all at once twice during the semester, once at their midterm and once at the end of the semester. Each week when I collected the five journals, I would take them back with me and I would read each entry throughout the course of the week. I would comment on their writing, ask them further questions so that they might expand even further on their insights, and give them general feedback on how they were doing on the content of their journals (were they a little light or were they talking about non-related material?). This became a good space for me and my students to communicate about the reading in an informal way; a way for me to read their thoughts and share my own in a one-to-one setting. I also felt like I got to know my students a little bit better through these journals as well.
...Or they would write about how they and their friends went bike riding around campus... |
I really loved the journals in this course, as a teacher. It gave me a unique opportunity to get to know my students minds in a way that was not possible before. I gave them a lot of supportive feedback, particularly in the beginning, and they began to believe that I was not tricking them when I said that I did not care about spelling and grammar. As I said earlier, in addition to simply finding another way to help students relate to the content, this was also a wonderful way in which to get to know my students a little better. We communicated on a one on one basis through writing, and I got to know their thought processes, their opinions, their writing styles, and a bit about themselves as well through journals.
Discussion
I also really wanted this class to be a discussion class. But, having worked for the past year with Chinese students, discussions can be difficult, especially if you are expecting the response to a discussion class to be similar to a class in the States. Now, any class, regardless of where you teach it, is going to be quiet at first, until trust is built, and until students become comfortable with the class, the teacher, each other, and the material they are discussing. However, in colleges in America, in a discussion class, you would probably have at least 3-5 students who love the idea of discussions Students who will not stop talking; each class they have something to say--even when the quality of their contributions are sub-par, they will keep going. These students took the class because it was a discussion course and they can get a good grade by participating.
This person is almost non-existent in China. Yes, there are 2-3 students who will finally speak up if you give them enough time and are willing to wait. But so many of their classes are either lecture or independent work, that getting them to speak in class takes a great deal of work. Also ,there is a lot of pressure on them to only speak when they have the 'right' answer.
The first step that I took in making discussions a part of our class was making their overall grade heavily dependent on participation. They are very concerned with their grades, and so making participation weigh heavily will motivate some students to contribute more to discussions. For the purpose of this class I split participation equally between journal entries and in class discussions (I wanted all students to discuss, but I did not want to be especially punitive to those who really struggled with expressing their thoughts verbally).
Getting their discussion on. |
The second step in this process is, of course, modeling. Show them what you mean by discussions. Video you and your friends having a discussion on a reading and show it to them; really demonstrate what you want them to do and how you want them to do it, especially when you are asking them to do something that they do not have a lot of familiarity doing. I would also provide them with a discussion question to prompt dialogue.
The final step is building trust, which takes time and a lot of positive feedback. In the beginning, I found that pretty much accepting all answers, even some fairly outrageous ones, during the discussion part to be helpful. I would not give the outrageous responses a great deal of praise, but I would not shut them down either. As we progressed, when students would give outrageous answers, I would begin to ask them questions that would help them further clarify their meaning or think a little deeper on the subject. Or I would ask the class what they thought about that response in order to get us on track when discussing the readings. By the end of the semester, my students were discussing experts. They would start talking, ask each other questions, ask me questions, argue with each other; by the end, during the discussion section, I felt pretty useless, as they were able to pretty much carry the discussion without me. Which was nice change from the beginning, where they were all quiet and staring at me...